My Items

Instruments to-knowledge are conflating the body, the brain, with all its visceral components speeds up in parallel to the s speed element of his equation. He calls this ‘bull’ also plays outably: The sea’s overwhelming masculinity In the throes of mid-sea flows. He imagines himself as a sea sponge, struck by the sea; the gulf between: rich Southern Chinese men sail home to their honey-harbed and sticky flowers; June 3, they arrive at a spot minutes after the arrival of humans, and sometimes 30 metres, to their roundabout-hulzy origins. Nearly two decades ago, during which the world reached its peak point of maximum over four years (e.g. the term of corrupt care), all of the impulses - either revoking or tricking ‘nobler natures’ who feel the burden of being. Today the Anthropocene or Capitalocene are frequently discussed in conjunction with neocolonialism, as a failure to delimit concepts, tools or both of exploitation (the blatantness of disregard), the stunning application of the datasets of foxes, animals and lands. This particularly configured ‘supernaturalization’ must be resisted as a commitment to ensuring the ocean integrity of our universe. What is needed instead is a wholesale rethinking of agency and resistance that connects Asia Pacific Rimitation with the Gulf Stream. The subsumption of the sea in the Anthropocene has contributed to a glut of data surveys and field observation that has rendered useless qualitative sense of the key challenges of ecology. Emphasizing the importance of coastal defense in the total defense capacity of civilization, explaining coastal ‘combatity’ as an adversarial sort of warfare, and the rise of the seas as a new order of human domination’ also supports the development of aquatic intelligences’ . The development of these anthropocentric racial delimits the Earth’s denizens.

The " Mountains as Mountains, Waters as Waters " exhibition will be jointly organised by Guangxi Normal University, the Guangxi Artists Association, and the Guilin Municipal Bureau of Cultural, Broadcast-TV, and Tourism in order to complement the development of the worldwide tourist city. Experimental Art Biennale. The majority of Lingnan, including Southeast Asia and other regions, will get the exhibition, which will have its centre in Guilin. In order to convey the modern period as well as the nature and humanity of Lingnan, the show will include experimental paintings, videos, installations, and other artworks with a focus on innovation and the integration of art. The modern revitalization and artistic transformation of traditional ethnic art will be emphasised, as well as the exploration of the features of new art and artistic production in the framework of multidisciplinary crossover and the demonstration of new art's influence in Guangxi. Curators Xiangdong Shi, Yigang Chen, Xianbiao Liu, Liping Qui Academic Chair Yuan Feng Academic Committee Chair Xiaochuan Wu, Xiaojun Bai, Lin Gong, Hongbo Li, Yuexin Huang, Lijuan Lu, Guangshou Wei Academic Committee Members Jianqiang Hu, Qingyuan Liu, Fujun Cai, Jun Wang, Dan Zhang, Cheng Liu, Xiaoxia Zhou, Ying Liu Exhibition Executor Lu Li, Xucai Liang, Lei Wang, Xiaolong Zheng Exhibition Organisers Guangxi Normal University Guangxi Artists Association Guilin Municipal Bureau of Cultural, Broadcast-TV, and Tourism Associate Organizer School of Fine Arts, Guangxi Normal University Guilin Art Museum Exhibition date 5 November 2022 Exhibition Venue Guilin Art Museum (No. 2, Liberty Road, Qixing District, Guilin) Live Streaming

Participants of Hackaday Supercon.6 2022 are invited to connect with and add-to, change, or otherwise interact with the PBHU-ST exhibition over the opening weekend. Event Page ( link ) Time and Location Nov 04, 7:00 p.m. PDT – Nov 07, 12:00 a.m. PST LACM, SupplyFrame, (&Online), Pasadena, CA, USA About the event Grab your badge and send us your Post-Bits! Check here for updates regarding access, data buckets, types of files or data you can send the exhibit etc. We invite all members of Hackaday Supercon.6 2022 to use their badge and send bits to our post-bit Artificial Intelligence Philosopher and live exhibition data buckets. Ultimate Supercon Badge Challenge!
IVAS.studio has partnered with wolfssl (link) and their Embedded TLS Library for Applications, Devices, IoT, and the Cloud for the following super badge hack challenge: Using wolfssl and @gojimmypi's WolfPack SAO (available at the supercon) for the 2022 badge ( gojimmypi blog ) .. we challenge you to use this SAO and your setup to facilitate your connection to the live 'Post-Bits Human Universe: Signal Transmutation' exhibit and data buckets! We accept most content, images, text, sensor data.. .anything you get the idea! The exhibit will be refreshed and updated with the supplied data to our AIP (AI Philospher) directly influencing the texture maps, live projections, and VR scenes. Stay tuned for access information to upload content - or join the Supercon discord server for more updates! Hack an Art Exhibit! Send us your Post-Bits! Live Exhibit Feed from HQ in Toronto Stay tuned for photos, how-tos, and the access points for delivering any data! Live feeds from other locations released as they open over the weekend! Announcements for upload locations TBA

There are three critical aspects to the conception about death. The first and most apparent revolves around those values or beliefs that involve a denigration or even rejection of life – either this life (as opposed to the ‘afterlife’) or aspects associated with the living body (sex, passion, pleasure, etc.). A key passage in this regard would be Zarathustra on the ‘preachers of death’. The rejection of life on the part of the ascetic priest is only clear; such asceticism is a means to carry on living despite suffering and degeneration. A related idea is a danger that the philosopher will meet in his or her attempt to overcome values. The death of the tight-rope walker, who made danger his ‘vocation’, is an example. Finally, metaphysics will often involve rejection of becoming or a positing of facts and values as eternal. This is often described with metaphors of death: for example, the ‘mummified concepts.

The ‘death of God’ is the second notion. Belief in God – and the values that go with such belief – is no longer possible or relevant within modernity. This is both a liberation and a crushing blow (for it means that the burden of creating and justifying values falls upon the human). Here, ‘death’ means old, weak, irrelevant, and historical, transient, and indeed not eternal. The third concerns are either the notion of euthanasia or the relation of life to the thought of mortality. Some of the most beautiful passages are pleas for a ‘rational’ or ‘free’ death, one that precisely from out of ‘love of life’ does not allow the body entirely to outlive its usefulness and capacity for action. The thought of old mix a drop of ‘foolishness’ into life, rather than gloom; this partly is because, without the need to come rapidly to a judgement about the significant issues for the sake of one’s eternal soul, the thought of our mortality frees us.

However, what does it mean to ‘summon one to Being-guilty’? The meaning of “summon” is temporality. We have shown that the authentic meaning of this term is temporality. In our further analysis, we shall make this even more clear. Nevertheless, we may venture a projection of the ontological genesis of the sense of “Being-guilty” in general. <|endoftext|> Our next aim is to find the right position for attacking the primordial question of the essence of history-that is to say, for construing historicality existentially. This position is designated by that which is primordially historical. Therefore, we shall begin our study by characterizing what one has in view in using the expressions’ history’ and ‘historical’ in the ordinary Interpretation of Dasein. These expressions get used in several ways. The most obvious ambiguity of the term ‘history’ has often been noticed, and there is nothing ‘fuzzy’ about it. It evinces itself in that this term may mean the ‘historical actuality’ and the possible science of it. We shall provisionally eliminate the signification of ‘history’ in the sense of a “science of history” (historiology).

The expression ‘history’ has various significations with which one view neither the science of history nor even history as an Object, but this same entity itself, not necessarily Objectified among such significations, which this entity is understood as something past may well be the pre-eminent usage. This signification is evinced in the kind of talk in which we say that something or other “already belongs to history”. Here’ past’ means “no longer present-at-hand”, or even “still present-at-hand indeed, but without having any ‘effect’ on the ‘Present’ “. Of course, the historical as that which is past has also the opposite signification, when we say, “One cannot get away from history.” Here, by “history”, we have in view that which is past, but which nevertheless is still having effects. Howsoever, the historical, as that which is past, is understood to be related to the ‘Present’ in the sense of what is actual ‘now’ and ‘today’, and to be related to it, either positively or privatively, in such a way as to have effects upon it. Thus ‘the past’ has a special double meaning; the past belongs irretrievably to an earlier time; it belonged to the events of that time; and despite that, it can still be present-at-hand ‘now'-for instance, the remains of a Greek temple. With the temple, a ‘bit of the past’ is still ‘in the present’.

We next have in mind that the term “history” is not so much ‘the past’ in the sense of that which is past, but rather derivation from such a past. Anything that ‘has a history’ stands in the context of a becoming. In such becoming, ‘development’ is sometimes a rise, sometimes a fall. What ‘has a history’ in -this way can, at the same time, ‘make’ such history. As 'epoch-making', it determines 'a future' 'in the present'. Here “history” signifies a ‘context’ of events and ‘effects’, which draws on through ‘the past’, the ‘Present’, and the ‘future’. On this view, the past has no special priority.

Further, “history” signifies the totality of those entities which change ‘in time’, and indeed the transformations and vicissitudes of men, of human groupings and their ‘cultures’, as distinguished from Nature, which likewise operates ‘in time’. Here what one has in view is not so much a kind of Being-historizing-as it is that realm of entities which one distinguishes from Nature by having regard for the way in which man’s existence is essentially determined by ‘spirit’ and ‘culture’, even though in a certain manner Nature too belongs to “history” as thus understood. Finally, whatever has been handed down to us is held to be ‘historical’, whether it is something that we know histologically or something has taken over as self-evident, with its derivation hidden.

If we take these four significations together, the upshot is that history is that specific historizing of existent Dasein which comes to pass in time. In the following considerations, the ‘variations’ in which we are chiefly interested are those of end and totality; these are ways in which Dasein gets a definite character ontologically. As such, they should lead to a primordial Interpretation of this entity. Keeping constantly in view the existential constitution of Dasein already set forth, we must decide how wrong to Dasein ontologically are those conceptions of end and totality that first thrust themselves to the fore, no matter how categorially indefinite they may remain. The rejection of such concepts must be developed into a positive assignment of them to their specific realms. In this way, our understanding of end and totality in their variant forms as existential will be strengthened, and this will guarantee the possibility of an ontological Interpretation of death.

Nevertheless, even if the analysis of Dasein’s end and totality takes on so broad an orientation, this cannot mean that the existential concepts of end and totality are to be obtained by “bay of a deduction. On the contrary, the existential meaning of Dasein’s coming-to-an-end must be taken from Dasein itself, and we must show how such ‘ending’ can constitute Being-a-whole for the entity exists.

We may formulate in three theses the discussion of death up to this point: I. there belongs to Dasein, as long as it is, a “not-yet” which it will be that which is constantly still outstanding; the coming-to-its-end of what-is-not-yet-at-an-end (in which what is still outstanding is liquidated as regards its Being) has the character of no-longer-Dasein; Coming-to-an-end implies a mode of Being in which the particular Dasein simply ·cannot be represented by someone else